May 12th 2024

“Your mind in 5GW is the cognitive battlespace where shadowy governments aim to achieve decision dominance. The critical nature of defense of your mind at the individual level cannot be understated.” —Introduction to 5GW

State and non-state actors

Tribalized

State actors refer to individuals or entities that are associated with or represent a government or state. They play a significant role in various domains, including information control, human rights, government speech, and cybersecurity.Nov 13, 2023

A non-state actor (NSA) is an individual or organization that has significant political influence but is not allied to any particular country or state.[1]

The interests, structure, and influence of NSAs vary widely.

For example, among NSAs are non-profit organizations, labor unions, non-governmental organizations, banks, corporations, media organizations, business magnates, people’s liberation movements, lobby groups, religious groups, aid agencies, and violent non-state actors such as paramilitary forces.

Vanguard [Party]

noun

1. the foremost division or the front part of an army; advance guard; van.

2. the forefront in any movement, field, activity, or the like.


3) the leaders of any intellectual or political movement.


4) (initial capital letter) Rocketry. a U.S. three-stage, satellite-launching rocket, the first two stages powered by liquid-propellant engines and the third by a solid-propellant engine.

Tenants of 5GW = Randomness and Ambiguity = Principles of Covert Action

Compare Tenets of 5GW (looks to be a typo in earlier text)

Tenets of 5GW =

noun

• any opinion, principle, doctrine, dogma, etc., especially one held as true by members of a profession, group, or movement.

Synonyms: position, belief

The word tenet is often mispronounced as [ten, -, uh, nt], with an extra /n/ sound in the second syllable—exactly like the word tenant (meaning someone who rents and occupies an apartment, office, etc.). It is a mistake made by people across a wide range of educational backgrounds, because it is such a natural one to make: English has thousands of words that end in the unstressed syllable -ant or -ent, such as parent, accident, potent, and relevant. Moreover, the two sounds at the end of all these words—/n/ and /t/—are very easily made together because we pronounce them with the tongue in the same place, touching the upper palate (or roof) of the mouth. The almost identical-sounding and common word tenant makes it all too easy for the extra /n/ to creep into the second syllable of tenet. Another word that is liable to be mispronounced in a similar way, with an extra /n/ in the second syllable, is pundit. No doubt the first /n/ in both tenet and pundit also influences their mispronunciation. And in pundit, the /d/ sound is another one made in the same place as both /n/ and /t/. Talk about piling on!

Actions “by design” cloaked Randomness and Ambiguity so as not to reveal the Actual Cause or Actuator.

Groupthink =

noun

• the practice of approaching problems or issues as matters that are best dealt with by consensus of a group rather than by individuals acting independently; conformity.


the lack of individual creativity, or of a sense of personal responsibility, that is sometimes characteristic of group interaction.

Fomented =

foment (fəˈmɛnt)

vb (tr)

1. to encourage or instigate (trouble, discord, etc); stir up

2. (Medicine) med to apply heat and moisture to (a part of the body) to relieve pain and inflammation

[C15: from Late Latin fōmentāre, from Latin fōmentum a poultice, ultimately from fovēre to foster]

fomentation n

foˈmenter n

Usage: Both foment and ferment can be used to talk about stirring up trouble: he was accused of fomenting/fermenting unrest. Only ferment can be used intransitively or as a noun: his anger continued to ferment (not foment); rural areas were unaffected by the ferment in the cities

Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014 © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014

This 5GW subject has a vast complexity with deep dives into the psychologies of group members of every subject conceivable so one must approach this by way of perception and defining the proximate context in some analytical focus. This is Intelligence Agency stuff! A basic level would enable perception and recognition of the presence and sources of so called “Hidden Influences” (such as cultivated in Advertising Sales and Marketing) so as not to be affected or “hypnotized” or (entranced) within a subliminally suggestible State of Mind. Take, for example, the practice and self-disciplined training of Yoga Sutra as proof against such “Hidden Influences” in a Metaphysical approach expediently dispensing with the vast complexities of Geopolitical Battlespace Scenarios. Such would have to be ethically proportionate to one’s Real World Level of Responsibility effective in the Planetary Society at Large. One’s familiarity with the analytical and technical subject of 5GW 5th Generation Warfare would necessarily resonate with one’s personal status (responsibility) experience and common sense. —crp

Decision Dominance. The factors called for in making critical decisions (or any decision making agenda) One’s cognitive base of experiential knowledge and wisdom comes into play – however one’s mind is programmed to discern and think; and then decide.

Intentions.

Motivations.

Agenda.

First Principles =

In philosophy and science, a first principle is a basic proposition or assumption that cannot be deduced from any other proposition or assumption. First principles in philosophy are from first cause[1] attitudes and taught by Aristotelians, and nuanced versions of first principles are referred to as postulates by Kantians.[2]

In mathematics and formal logic, first principles are referred to as axioms or postulates. In physics and other sciences, theoretical work is said to be from first principles, or ab initio, if it starts directly at the level of established science and does not make assumptions such as empirical model and parameter fitting. “First principles thinking” consists of decomposing things down to the fundamental axioms in the given arena, before reasoning up by asking which ones are relevant to the question at hand, then cross referencing conclusions based on chosen axioms and making sure conclusions do not violate any fundamental laws. Physicists include counterintuitive concepts with reiteration.

An axiom, postulate, or assumption is a statement that is taken to be true, to serve as a premise or starting point for further reasoning and arguments. The word comes from the Ancient Greek word ἀξίωμα (axíōma), meaning ‘that which is thought worthy or fit’ or ‘that which commends itself as evident’.[1][2]

The precise definition varies across fields of study. In classic philosophy, an axiom is a statement that is so evident or well-established, that it is accepted without controversy or question.[3] In modern logic, an axiom is a premise or starting point for reasoning.[4]

In mathematics, an axiom may be a “logical axiom” or a “non-logical axiom”. Logical axioms are taken to be true within the system of logic they define and are often shown in symbolic form (e.g., (A and B) implies A), while non-logical axioms are substantive assertions about the elements of the domain of a specific mathematical theory, for example a + 0 = a in integer arithmetic.

Non-logical axioms may also be called “postulates” or “assumptions”. In most cases, a non-logical axiom is simply a formal logical expression used in deduction to build a mathematical theory, and might or might not be self-evident in nature (e.g., the parallel postulate in Euclidean geometry). To axiomatize a system of knowledge is to show that its claims can be derived from a small, well-understood set of sentences (the axioms), and there are typically many ways to axiomatize a given mathematical domain.

Any axiom is a statement that serves as a starting point from which other statements are logically derived. Whether it is meaningful (and, if so, what it means) for an axiom to be “true” is a subject of debate in the philosophy of mathematics.[5]

Limited Hangout

According to Victor Marchetti, a former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a limited hangout is “spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.”[1][2] While used by the CIA and other intelligence organizations, the tactic has become popularized in the corporate and political spheres.[3]