May 31st 2024

CNN Senior Legal Analyst Describes How The Trump Conviction Was A Political Hit Job

1. “The judge donated money… in plain violation of a rule prohibiting New York judges from making political donations—to a pro-Biden, anti-Trump political operation.”

2. Alvin Bragg boasted on the campaign trail in an overwhelmingly Democrat county, “It is a fact that I have sued Trump over 100 times.”

3. “Most importantly, the DA’s charges against Trump push the outer boundaries of the law and due process.”

4. “The charges against Trump are obscure, and nearly entirely unprecedented. In fact, no state prosecutor — in New York, or Wyoming, or anywhere — has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime, against anyone, for anything. None. Ever.”

5. The DA inflated misdemeanors past the statute of limitations and “electroshocked them back to life” by alleging the falsification of business records was committed ‘with intent to commit another crime.’

6. “Inexcusably, the DA refused to specify what those unlawful means actually were — and the judge declined to force them to pony up — until right before closing arguments. So much for the constitutional obligation to provide notice to the defendant of the accusations against him in advance of trial.”

7. “In these key respects, the charges against Trump aren’t just unusual. They’re bespoke, seemingly crafted individually for the former president and nobody else.”

8. “The Manhattan DA’s employees reportedly have called this the “Zombie Case” because of various legal infirmities, including its bizarre charging mechanism. But it’s better characterized as the Frankenstein Case, cobbled together with ill-fitting parts into an ugly, awkward, but more-or-less functioning contraption that just might ultimately turn on its creator.”

Link to full article below.

—Kanekoa The Great

Megyn Kelly Issues MASSIVE Warning to Democrats After Guilty Trump Verdict

“What just happened today is a line we can’t uncross.”

Vigilant FoxMay 30, 2024

“These Democrats will rue the day they decided to use lawfare to stop a presidential candidate,” warned Megyn Kelly, a prominent broadcaster and journalist, on her show Thursday evening.

In light of the New York ‘hush money’ trial guilty verdict, making Donald Trump the first former president in American history to be convicted of a felony, Kelly suggested that a reckoning is coming for Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton.

“You just wait, and it won’t be Hunter Biden the next time,” she declared. “It’s going to be Joe Biden. It could potentially still be Barack Obama. It could still potentially be Hillary Clinton. We’re going to have to look at what the statutes of limitations are on the various crimes they surely committed. We’re going to have to look at passing laws to revive those dead crimes, felonies, or misdemeanors so that those cases can be brought out of time.”

Kelly concluded, “The only way to save the Republic now is to give them a taste of their own medicine.”

She compared the Democrats to a wolf that just “tasted blood” and suggested the only way to stop a wolf from “coming back for more” is “if he loses a limb of his own.”

“Who’s getting indicted next?” she asked. “Joe Biden? Maybe Jill Biden? How low can we go? You may not want to see it. That ship has already left port. That horse has left the barn. That’s where we’re going. So before you celebrate too much over at MSNBC and CNN, who are positively gleeful, gleeful over this absurd conviction, you wait and ask yourself, ask yourself what kind of Pandora’s box has been opened here?”

Watch Kelly’s full response to the Trump verdict on her YouTube channel:

🚨REPORTER: “Mr. President, can you tell us, sir, Donald Trump refers to himself as a political prisoner and blames you directly? What’s your response to that sir?”

BIDEN: *Evil Smirk*

🚨 WOW: Biden reacts to the verdict yesterday in Trump’s New York trial claiming it wasn’t rigged and the jury was completely unbiased

—Benny Johnson

Joe Biden addresses the Trump verdict by ignoring the fact the trial was a drive by shooting of the Constitution and 200 years of norms and traditions:

“Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case.”

1) No, Trump wasn’t given every opportunity to defend himself. The judge ran roughshod over his rights and was in the bag for the prosecution.

2) The state’s case relied on an alleged federal violation that was NEVER tried.

What a fraud.

—Charlie Kirk